In recent years, Explainable AI (XAI) methods have facilitated profound validation and knowledge extraction from ML models. While extensively studied for classification, few XAI solutions have addressed the challenges specific to regression models. In regression, explanations need to be precisely formulated to address specific user queries (e.g.\ distinguishing between `Why is the output above 0?' and `Why is the output above 50?'). They should furthermore reflect the model's behavior on the relevant data sub-manifold. In this paper, we introduce XpertAI, a framework that disentangles the prediction strategy into multiple range-specific sub-strategies and allows the formulation of precise queries about the model (the `explanandum') as a linear combination of those sub-strategies. XpertAI is formulated generally to work alongside popular XAI attribution techniques, based on occlusion, gradient integration, or reverse propagation. Qualitative and quantitative results, demonstrate the benefits of our approach.

Wind turbine power curve models translate ambient conditions into turbine power output. They are essential for energy yield prediction and turbine performance monitoring. In recent years, increasingly complex machine learning methods have become state-of-the-art for this task. Nevertheless, they frequently encounter criticism due to their apparent lack of transparency, which raises concerns regarding their performance in non-stationary environments, such as those faced by wind turbines. We, therefore, introduce an explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) framework to investigate and validate strategies learned by data-driven power curve models from operational wind turbine data. With the help of simple, physics-informed baseline models it enables an automated evaluation of machine learning models beyond standard error metrics. Alongside this novel tool, we present its efficacy for a more informed model selection. We show, for instance, that learned strategies can be meaningful indicators for a model's generalization ability in addition to test set errors, especially when only little data is available. Moreover, the approach facilitates an understanding of how decisions along the machine learning pipeline, such as data selection, pre-processing, or training parameters, affect learned strategies. In a practical example, we demonstrate the framework's utilisation to obtain more physically meaningful models, a prerequisite not only for robustness but also for insights into turbine operation by domain experts. The latter, we demonstrate in the context of wind turbine performance monitoring. Alongside this paper, we publish a Python implementation of the presented framework and hope this can guide researchers and practitioners alike toward training, selecting and utilizing more transparent and robust data-driven wind turbine power curve models.

Accurate wind turbine power curve models, which translate ambient conditions into turbine power output, are crucial for wind energy to scale and fulfill its proposed role in the global energy transition. While machine learning (ML) methods have shown significant advantages over parametric, physics-informed approaches, they are often criticised for being opaque 'black boxes', which hinders their application in practice. We apply Shapley values, a popular explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) method, and the latest findings from XAI for regression models, to uncover the strategies ML models have learned from operational wind turbine data. Our findings reveal that the trend towards ever larger model architectures, driven by a focus on test set performance, can result in physically implausible model strategies. Therefore, we call for a more prominent role of XAI methods in model selection. Moreover, we propose a practical approach to utilize explanations for root cause analysis in the context of wind turbine performance monitoring. This can help to reduce downtime and increase the utilization of turbines in the field.